Young Choi Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that summary judgment in the government’s favor was warranted where plaintiff “fail[ed] to raise a material issue of fact regarding the . . . transactions that depleted the majority of a recipient’s monthly food stamp benefit”
• granting summary judgment in agency’s favor where EBT data revealed “rapid and multiple transactions”
• “The law is clear that FNS may base its finding of a violation on analysis of EBT transaction reports or on-site surveys”
• “The law is clear that FNS may base its finding of a violation on analysis of EBT transaction reports or on-site store surveys.”
• “The law is clear that 17 FNS may base its finding of a violation on analysis of EBT transaction reports or on-site store surveys”
• “[t]o defeat a motion for summary judgment, the nonmoving party needs to raise material issues of fact [as] to every alleged violation charged against it”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).