Skip to main content
· 4/20/1989

Young China Daily v. Chappell

Citations

  • 742 F. Supp. 552
  • 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17085
  • 1989 WL 224586

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding an abuse of discretion and characterizing the Service’s failure to consider the petitioner’s letter and additional letters from professionals involved in the occupation as “a failure to consider relevant factors” in rendering its decision
  • newly-created graphic designer position a specialty job in spite of small size of the newspaper

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jensen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.