Young Apartments, Inc. v. Town of Jupiter, FL

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an economic injury is sufficient to meet the injury-in-fact requirement for third-party standing
• holding that a lost rent payment was a concrete injury for standing purposes
• stating that “it is ‘clearly preferable’ that a plaintiff state explicitly in what capacity defendants are being sued”
• explaining that, to establish third party standing, “the litigant must have a close relation to the third party”
• noting that a plaintiff must satisfy the similarly situated standard whether asserting an equal protection claim under a class of one theory or a traditional theory of discrimination based on a suspect classification
• finding that school board was immune from punitive damages under Section 1983

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).