Yost v. Yost

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “ ‘the financial resources, needs and obligations of both custodial and noncustodial parents’ encompass their share of the community property of their new marital communities”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Nab v. Nab
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1988-06-21· cited 43×
• Levin v. Levin
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1992-07-10· cited 30×
• Rohr v. Rohr
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1996-02-05· cited 26×
• Reid v. Reid
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1992-01-10· cited 9×
• Rohr v. Rohr
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1994-04-01· cited 9×
• Rodgers v. Rodgers
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1994-12-22· cited 8×
• Howard v. Mecham
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1990-04-06· cited 6×
• Drinkall v. Drinkall
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2011-03-02· cited 2×
• Harris v. Carter
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2008-07-16· cited 2×
• Franks v. Franks
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1991-05-29· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sheets v. Agro-West, Inc.
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1983-06-07· cited 56×
• Fought v. Fought
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1963-06-20· cited 52×
• Embree v. Embree
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1963-03-29· cited 35×
• Smith v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1975-05-05· cited 14×
• In Re Marriage of Havens
  California Court of Appeal· 1981-11-24· cited 7×