Skip to main content
· 10/13/1998

Yoshioka v. Punalu'u Development, Inc.

Citations

  • 90 Haw. 472
  • 979 P.2d 68
  • 1998 Haw. LEXIS 401

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that there was no new and material evidence to reopen claim where newly presented evidence was not “accompanied by any medical evidence indicating a nexus to service”
  • holding that criteria expressed in the conjunctive are connected by \and\
  • holding that criteria expressed in the conjunctive are connected by \and\
  • awarding service connection for left-ear hearing loss and denying it for right-ear hearing loss

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.