Skip to main content
· 1/23/1985

Yorke v. B.F. Goodrich Co.

Citations

  • 474 N.E.2d 20
  • 130 Ill. App. 3d 220
  • 40 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 916
  • 85 Ill. Dec. 606
  • 1985 Ill. App. LEXIS 1514

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the dominant purpose test to determine whether contracts are for the sale of goods or services when both are plainly involved
  • contract called for provision of plastic pellets to make vinyl siding; the defendant provided consulting services in exchange for the plaintiff's continued purchase of pellets; the court held this to be a contract for goods
  • contract called for provision of plastic pellets to make vinyl siding; the defendant provided consulting services in exchange for the plaintiff’s continued purchase of pellets; the court held this to be a contract for goods

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lindberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.