York v. Zullich

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant had no “vested right to introduce inadmissible evidence at Ms retrial merely because that evidence was erroneously admitted without objection at his first trial”
• defendant had no “vested right to introduce inadmissible evidence at his retrial merely because that evidence was erroneously admitted without objection at his first trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).