York v. Nash

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “Because [plaintiff] seeks certification of a nationwide class for which the law of forty-eight states potentially applies, she bears the burden of demonstrating ‘a suitable and realistic plan for trial of the class claims.’”
• noting that the appellant sought 8 “certification of three separate claims—negligence, products liability, and medical monitoring”
• “[The] court cannot rely merely on assurances of counsel that any problems with predominance or superiority can be overcome”
• “[t]he party seeking certification bears the burden of showing that each of the four requirements of Rule 23(a) and at least one requirement of Rule 23(b) have been met”
• trial court must conduct a “rigorous analysis” to determine whether the requirements of Rule 23 have been met

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).