Skip to main content
· 11/1/1996

York Products, Inc. v. Central Tractor Farm & Family Center and Custom Form Manufacturing, Inc.

Citations

  • 99 F.3d 1568
  • 40 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1619
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 28973
  • 1996 WL 632561

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that plurality means “at least two”
  • affirming district court construction of the phrase “[s]ubstantially the entire height thereof” as requiring nearly or almost the entire height thereof
  • construing \means\ in claim without reference to section 112, paragraph 6
  • construing “means” in claim without reference to section 112, paragraph 6
  • finding proper a party’s consent to adverse party’s JMOL so it could appeal claim construction order, so as “to expedite its appeal and to conserve both its client’s and the court’s resources”
  • “Without an express intent to impart a novel meaning to claim terms, an inventor’s claim terms take on their ordinary meaning.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rader, Skelton, Bryson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.