· 11/1/1996
York Products, Inc. v. Central Tractor Farm & Family Center and Custom Form Manufacturing, Inc.
Citations
- 99 F.3d 1568
- 40 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1619
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 28973
- 1996 WL 632561
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that plurality means “at least two”
- affirming district court construction of the phrase “[s]ubstantially the entire height thereof” as requiring nearly or almost the entire height thereof
- construing \means\ in claim without reference to section 112, paragraph 6
- construing “means” in claim without reference to section 112, paragraph 6
- finding proper a party’s consent to adverse party’s JMOL so it could appeal claim construction order, so as “to expedite its appeal and to conserve both its client’s and the court’s resources”
- “Without an express intent to impart a novel meaning to claim terms, an inventor’s claim terms take on their ordinary meaning.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rader, Skelton, Bryson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.