York Manufacturing Co. v. Colley
Citations
- 247 U.S. 21
- 38 S. Ct. 430
- 62 L. Ed. 963
- 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1954
Syllabus
<p>In an interstate contract for sale of a complicated ice-making plant, it was stipulated that the parts should be shipped into the purchasers’ State and the plant there assembled and tested under the supervision of an expert to be sent by the seller. The purchasers agreed to pay him a per diem while so engaged and to furnish mechanics for his assistance, and their obligation to accept the plant was made dependent on the test. The erection took three weeks and the test a week more. Held, that these provisions as to the services of the expert were germane to the transaction as an interstate contract and did not involve the doing of local business subjecting the seller to regulations' of Texas concerning foreign corporations. Browning v. Waycross, 233 U. S. 16, and General Railway Signal Co. v. Virginia, 246- U. S. 500, distinguished.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- contract for manufacture, delivery and installation of an ice plant -where the various parts -and machines were shipped disassembled; company engineers supervised assembly and installation by purchaser’s laborers and tested the plant before acceptance
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: White, Pitney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.