Skip to main content
· 7/5/1904

York City School Dist. v. Ætna Indemnity Co.

Citations

  • 131 F. 131
  • 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4886

Syllabus

<p>1. Suretyship — Contracts—Omitted Provisions — Reformation of Instrument — Federal Courts — Jurisdiction.</p> <p>Where, after a building contractor, who had agreed to erect a schoolhouse for plaintiff school district, had abandoned the contract, the school board and the contractor’s surety entered into an agreement under which the board was entitled to finish the work at the expense of the surety, whatever its cost, the surety, in an action at law in the federal courts on such contract to recover the difference between the amount so expended and the contract price, was not entitled to have the contract reformed for the purpose of inserting an alleged omitted provision that, if the surety would waive a payment erroneously made by the school board to the contractor, and would agree to the payment of certain debts due to local materialmen and laborers, the district would finish the building within the contract price.</p>

Judges: Archbadd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.