York Apartments Tenants Ass'n v. District of Columbia Zoning Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that petitioner lacked standing to assert generalized claims that creating a new college dormitory would result in the loss of new property tax revenue, new jobs, and new essential housing in the Downtown area
• explaining a litigant has constitutional standing when they have suffered “an invasion of a legally protected interest which is (a) concrete and particularized, and (b
• acknowledging a litigant’s standing in a zoning case cannot be based on “generalized grievances”
• rejecting argument that time for filing review petition may run from date decision is published in D.C. Register rather than subsequent date of service; “having a uniform filing deadline for all petitioners ... is preferable”
• plaintiffs alleged that construction of mixed dormitory-classroom structure across street from their homes would affect “quiet enjoyment of their homes” and “livability of their neighborhood”
• allegations made by a petitioner which are merely conjectural or hypothetical fail to establish the “injury in fact” requirement for standing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).