Yordy v. Osterman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a court should \disregard[ ] the conflicting religious preferences of the parties\
• stating that a court should \disregard[ ] the conflicting religious preferences of the parties\
• trial court has authority to decide between secular and religious schools, based on best interest of child, where parents with joint legal custody cannot agree
• when resolving parenting dispute on child’s school placement by disregarding conflicting religious preferences and focusing upon other important factors, court order did not offend First Amendment Establishment Clause
• the district court has the authority to resolve disputes regarding choice of school when parents have joint custody but do not agree
• district court has authority to decide between secular and religious schools, based on best interests of child, where parents with joint legal custody cannot agree

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).