Skip to main content
· 6/7/2004

Yohannes W. Habtemicael v. John D. Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States

Citations

  • 370 F.3d 774
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 11070
  • 2004 WL 1237616

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing for substantial deference to the agency’s interpretation of its regulations
  • remanding Convention claim after upholding denial of asylum and withholding of removal claims
  • providing for substantial deference to the agency’s interpretation of its regulations
  • “[T]he extent of [the EPLF’s] authority in 1985 and 1986 is a question for the immigration judge in the first instance, as is any legal consequence.”
  • fear of mandatory military service cannot form basis for asylum claim unless service requirement is based on political beliefs
  • “[T]he extent of [the EPLF’s] authority in 1985 and 1986 is a question for the immigration judge in the first instance, as is any legal consequence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fagg, Lay, Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.