· 6/7/2004
Yohannes W. Habtemicael v. John D. Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States
Citations
- 370 F.3d 774
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 11070
- 2004 WL 1237616
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- providing for substantial deference to the agency’s interpretation of its regulations
- remanding Convention claim after upholding denial of asylum and withholding of removal claims
- providing for substantial deference to the agency’s interpretation of its regulations
- “[T]he extent of [the EPLF’s] authority in 1985 and 1986 is a question for the immigration judge in the first instance, as is any legal consequence.”
- fear of mandatory military service cannot form basis for asylum claim unless service requirement is based on political beliefs
- “[T]he extent of [the EPLF’s] authority in 1985 and 1986 is a question for the immigration judge in the first instance, as is any legal consequence.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fagg, Lay, Murphy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.