Yoder v. Univ. of Louisville

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that since the plaintiff only alleged a disability and did not say which specific disability, the ADA claims could not survive
• holding that since the plaintiff only alleged a disability and did not say which specific disability, the ADA claims could not survive
• holding that the plaintiff failed to provide the defendant notice of his ADA claim where he only stated that “Defendant was aware of my disability” and “I was discriminated against because of my disability”
• stating that a discrimination claim is only required to allege a specific adverse employment action against the plaintiff based on a protected class
• stating that Title VII and ADA retaliation claims need only satisfy the pleading standards set forth in Luevano, 722 F.3d at 1028
• noting that the Seventh Circuit has “read ‘case’ in section 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) to mean ‘complaint’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).