· 9/7/1976
Federal Case
Citations
- 537 F.2d 1347
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- plaintiff’s speculation insufficient to establish fact of damage in an antitrust suit
- upon proof of an antitrust conspiracy by patent holders, the finder of fact should consider both the “total amount of royalties paid” and evidence of what a “ ‘reasonable’ royalty rate” would have been
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.