Skip to main content
S.D. Indiana· 3/23/2012

Yochim v. Gargano

Citations

  • 882 F. Supp. 2d 1068
  • 2012 WL 1014840
  • 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39996

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • client of a vocational rehabilitation agency does not have the final or exclusive decision-making authority to determine his own vocational goal
  • state agency did not violate Title I when it refused to send a client to out-of-state center for the blind where local institutions could provide sufficient training at lower cost
  • agency may give due regard to financial costs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pratt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.