Yip v. Pagano

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a district court may appoint an amicus when “it deems the proffered information timely and useful”
• “it is not necessary that a witness be subpoenaed in order to receive the protection of the privilege” and it is “irrelevant” that a defendant’s statement was not made in response to a specific question
• \it is not necessary that a witness be subpoenaed in order to receive the protection of the privilege\ and it is \irrelevant\ that a defendant's statement was not made in response to a specific question
• “it is not necessary that a witness be subpoenaed in order to receive the protection of the privilege” and it is “irrelevant” that a defendant’s statement was not made in response to a specific question
• testimony before House Subcommittee on Crime
• testimony before House Subcommittee on Crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).