Skip to main content
· 7/20/1910

Yingst v. Harrisburg

Citations

  • 43 Pa. Super. 418
  • 1910 Pa. Super. LEXIS 64

Syllabus

<p>Sewers — Contract—Estoppel.</p> <p>Where a city pays a landowner a sum of money as a consideration for permission to build a sewer through his land, and the owner examines or has access to the maps, plans and profiles, and stands by while a manhole is being constructed on his premises and makes no objection thereto, and it appears that the manhole was an essential incident to the sewer, such owner cannot years afterwards maintain an action against the city for injuries to his land resulting from the construction and maintenance of the manhole.</p>

Judges: Beaver, Beforerice, Head, Henderson, Orlady, Porter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.