Skip to main content
· 3/12/1906

Yinger v. Youngman

Citations

  • 30 Pa. Super. 139
  • 1906 Pa. Super. LEXIS 34

Syllabus

<p>Landlord and tenant — Contract—Parol evidence — Contemporaneous agreement.</p> <p>Where, after the date of a lease, the tenant enters into an agreement in writing to pay a sum' in addition to the rent fixed by the lease for heating the portion of the building leased, the tenant may show in an action of replevin for goods distrained that he was induced to sign the agreement by a contemporaneous oral agreement by which the landlord was to put in heat radiators, and that this oral agreement was not fulfilled; but this he must show by evidence which is clear, precise and indubitable; and he must also show that through the failure to put in radiators, the premises were not adequately heated.</p>

Judges: Beaver, Henderson, Orlady, Porter, Rice, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.