Yick Man Mui v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “mandate rule bars re-litigation of issues already decided on direct appeal.”
• stating that the “mandate rule bars re-litigation [on a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion] of issues already decided on direct appeal”
• noting that, at the appellate level, “the law of the case rule” bars re‐litigation of issues on collateral attack that were “already decided on direct appeal”
• noting that, at the appellate level, “the law of the case rule” bars re-litigation of issues on collateral attack that were “already decided on direct appeal”
• explaining that a defendant can overcome the procedural-default rule only by “show[ing] cause for failing to raise the claim at the appropriate time and prejudice from the alleged error” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• describing rejection of ineffective assistance claims where the “factual predicates” are the same as on direct appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).