Yesudian Ex Rel. United States v. Howard University

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding district courts can grant even after-the-fact deadline extensions without finding excusable neglect if the other party was not prejudiced
• emphasizing that allowing a late dispositive motion “could obviate the need for trial, further conserving judicial resources and the time and money the parties will have to expend if this case proceeds to trial”
• exercising such discretion, and noting that the bar presented by a “failure to raise an issue in an initial appeal is far from absolute”
• affirming district court’s acceptance of untimely submission under Rule 6(b)(1)(B) based on a generous construction of an opposition memorandum and even without finding excusable neglect
• rejecting individual capacity liability under the FCA because “all the § 3730(h) remedies are phrased in mandatory language (the employee ‘shall be entitled,’ etc.
• exercising such discretion, and noting that the bar presented by a “failure to raise an issue in an initial appeal is far from absolute”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).