Yeomalakis v. Federal Deposit Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that FDIC was appointed Washington Mutual’s receiver on September 25, 2008
• noting that “courts would usually stay pending cases to allow for administrative exhaustion of claims ”
• explaining that motions for reconsideration under 59(e) are not intended to introduce new arguments that could and should have been introduced prior to judgment
• noting it is not the job of a court to create arguments for a party who has not made them or to “assemble them from assorted hints and references throughout the brief.”
• plaintiff-borrower’s motion to substitute Chase as a party failed because the agreement Chase signed with the FDIC when it acquired the relevant assets excluded assumption of liability for borrower claims
• “It is not our job, especially in a counseled civil case, to create arguments for someone who has not made them or to assemble them from assorted hints and references scattered throughout the brief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).