Yellowbear v. Wyoming Attorney General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that § 2241 is not the proper vehicle to challenge state court jurisdiction over the petitioner for a crime allegedly committed in Indian country
• explaining that “[a]bsence of jurisdiction in the convicting court is indeed a basis for federal habeas corpus relief cognizable under the due process clause”
• explaining that “§ 2241 is a vehicle for challenging pretrial detention”
• explaining “[a]bsence of jurisdiction in the convicting court is. . .a basis for federal habeas corpus relief cognizable under the due process clause”
• “Section [ ] 2241 is a vehicle for [a state prisoner] ... attacking the execution of a sentence.” (citations omitted)
• “Section [] 2241 is a vehicle for [a state prisoner] . . . attacking the execution of a sentence.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).