Skip to main content
· 7/30/2015

Yellow Pages Photos, Inc. v. Yellow Pages Group, LLC

Citations

  • 795 F.3d 1255
  • 92 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 869
  • 115 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1977
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 13297

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding “testimony [which] was pure speculation, and thus too attenuated to be relevant”
  • concluding that the evidence adduced at a jury trial supported a finding that the photographs were part of compilations
  • holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding a witness’s testimony because it “was pure speculation, and thus too attenuated to be relevant”
  • explaining that a plaintiff must elect between actual and statutory damages and may not recover both
  • explaining that “the manner of copyright registration is not dispositive of the works issue”
  • employing a similar ap- proach to discerning whether multiple photos constituted a compilation or individual works

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martin, Rosenbaum, Coogler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.