Yellow Cab Cooperative, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that under California law there is “a presumption that a service provider is presumed to be an employee unless the principal affirmatively proves otherwise”
• noting that, contrary to Yellow Cab’s insistence that it merely served as a lessor of taxicabs, Yellow “cultivated the passenger market by soliciting riders, process[ed] requests for service through a dispatching system,” and instructed the drivers in “service” and “courtesy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).