Skip to main content
· 3/24/2011

Yelin v. Swartz

Citations

  • 790 F. Supp. 2d 331
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31154
  • 2011 WL 1103450

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “the mere fact that [a] defendant happens to be an attorney” does not automatically invoke the privilege.
  • attorneys were not practicing law when they sent collection letters on behalf of their client

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Buckwalter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.