Skip to main content
· 5/23/2014

Yelena R. v. George R.

Citations

  • 326 P.3d 989
  • 2014 WL 2573345
  • 2014 Alas. LEXIS 105

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “it was error for the superior court not to make express findings that specified why unsupervised visitation would adversely affect the children’s well being”
  • “[W]here a trial court makes the required findings, whether those findings support a particular restriction on visitation is left to the trial court’s discretion.”
  • “[W]here a trial court makes the required findings, whether those findings support a particular restriction on visitation is left to the trial court’s discretion.”
  • “[If] a trial court makes the required findings, whether those findings support a particular restriction on visitation is left to the trial court’s discretion.”
  • reviewing visitation terms for abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fabe, Winfree, Stowers, Maassen, Bolger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.