Yebio v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a conversation that “did not get into intimate details and did not go into specifics” did not qualify as the first disclosure
• holding that a conversation that “did not get into intimate details and did not go into specifics” did not qualify as the first disclosure
• consecutive sentences not authorized when none of the sexual abuse incidents could have occurred after September 1, 1997
• consecutive sentences not authorized when none of the sexual abuse incidents could have occurred after September 1, 1997

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).