Yeaton v. Weisenburg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court erred in failing to inquire into nature of conflict and amount of delay required in substituting counsel
• holding that the trial court erred in failing to inquire into nature of conflict and amount of delay required in substituting counsel
• holding that there was “no need to reverse the convictions on the unchanged counts”
• holding that the district court abused its discretion in denying substitution primarily because the court failed to inquire adequately into the nature of the conflict
• reversing conviction despite request for substitution made on day of trial
• reversing conviction despite request for substitution made on day of trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).