Yeaton v. Fry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying the doctrine when no other means of ascertaining intent were available

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Andrews v. Herriot
  New York Supreme Court· 1825-08-15· cited 47×
• Lincoln v. Battelle
  New York Supreme Court· 1831-01-15· cited 41×
• Grant v. Lexington Fire, Life & Marine Insurance
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1854-05-22· cited 24×
• Economy Premier Assurance Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2013-11-25· cited 18×
• Sexton v. Brock
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1854-07-15· cited 11×
• Vagaszki v. Consolidation Coal Co.
  Second Circuit· 1915-08-16· cited 8×
• Parkhurst v. Gloucester Mutual Fishing Insurance
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1868-11-15· cited 5×
• Thompson v. Stewart
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1819-11-03· cited 5×
• Northwest Transp. Co. v. Boston Marine Ins.
  U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan· 1890-02-20· cited 5×
• The Adula
  Supreme Court· 1900-02-26· cited 4×
• Dulany v. Hodgkin
  Supreme Court· 1809-03-11· cited 3×
• Hood v. . Manhattan Fire Insurance Company
  New York Court of Appeals· 1854-12-05· cited 1×
• Ocean S. S. Co. v. Ætna Ins.
  S.D. Georgia· 1903-03-18· cited 1×
• Wilkins v. Tobacco Fire & Marine Insurance
  Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati· 1872-04-15
• Pacific Creosoting Co. v. Thames & Mersey Marine Ins.
  W.D. Washington· 1914-01-15

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• McDonough v. Fost
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1842-01-15· cited 8×
• Dulany v. Hodgkin
  Supreme Court· 1809-03-11· cited 3×