Yeatman, Woods & Co. v. Erwin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that because it is a rule of admissibility, Mil. R. Evid. 304 allows for the admission of statements otherwise excludable under the hearsay rules
• giving less deference to a military judge’s ruling where he did not engage in fact-finding on the record
• “Mil. R. Evid. 304(h)(2) is, manifestly, a rule of admissibility.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).