Yeager v. Zoning Hearing Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a variance “is appropriate only where the property, not the person, is subject to hardship”
• noting the property was well-suited to the purpose for which it was zoned and actually used
• “[Hertzberg] did not alter the principle that a substantial burden must attend all dimensionally compliant uses of the property, not just the particular use the owner chooses.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).