Yeager v. Dickerson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding a male supervisor’s comments to a female employee about his erectile dysfunction medicine, overtly sexual innuendoes and requests, and physical critiques of her clothing and body were not sufficiently severe or pervasive
• in hostile work environment based on sex case, indicating a hostile work environment claim requires showing, among other elements, that the harassment was based on one’s protected class
• “We do not believe the trial court erred by finding that as a matter of law, no appellant presented evidence of conduct sufficiently severe and pervasive so as to create a hostile work environment.”
• “A sexual harassment claim brought under the Kentucky Civil Rights Act (’KCRA’) is to be analyzed in the same manner as a claim brought under Title VII, its federal counterpart.” (quoting Clark v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 400 F.3d 341, 347 (6th Cir. 2005)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).