YE MON AUNG v. Gonzales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that discrepancies did not arise from applicant’s limited English skills because he had interpreter and asked for clarifications
• upholding adverse credibility finding based on IJʹs opinion that alienʹs testimony regarding significant events was vague and confusing
• requiring a showing of clear probability of future persecution to prevail on a withholding‐of‐removal claim and a showing of likelihood of torture for relief under the CAT

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).