Ybarra v. Arizona

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, even “[i]f an employer violates the posting requirement, the charging period is tolled until the plaintiff acquires actual knowledge of his rights or retains an attorney.”
• finding that even “[i]f an employer violates the posting requirement, the charging period- is tolled until the plaintiff acquires actual knowledge of his rights or retains an attorney.”
• affirming refusal to permit lack of memory to create an issue of fact against other side’s evidence
• finding equitable estoppel to be available under the ADEA but the specific facts of the case insufficient to support the application of equitable estoppel to toll a filing deadline
• explaining “equitable tolling applies where the defendant has wrongfully deceived or mislead the plaintiff” and “equitable estoppel applies where . . . the defendant engages in intentional misconduct to cause the plaintiff to miss the filing deadline”
• “The certainty and repose these provisions confer will be lost if their application is up for grabs in every case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).