Yau v. Santa Margarita Ford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating one of the elements for a claim of wrongful 8 discharge in violation of public policy is an employer-employee relationship
• “[E]motional injuries sustained in the course of employment are preempted by the workers’ compensation scheme and generally will not support an independent cause of action.”
• “[E]motional injuries sustained in the course of employment are preempted by the workers’ compensation scheme and generally will not support an independent cause of action.”
• “Under California law, workers’ compensation provides the 5 exclusive remedy for an intentional infliction of emotional distress claim that is based solely on 6 alleged personnel activity.”
• “Physical and emotional injuries sustained in the course of employment are preempted by the workers’ compensation scheme and generally will not support an independent cause of action.”
• “The elements of a claim for 16 wrongful discharge in violation of public policy are (1) an employer-employee relationship, (2) the 17 employer terminated the plaintiff's employment, (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).