Skip to main content

Yates v. State

Citations

  • 681 S.E.2d 190
  • 298 Ga. App. 727
  • 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 2428
  • 2009 Ga. App. LEXIS 748

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing Drinkard, supra, and explaining that “where the crimes charged are based on more than one separate act or transaction, no merger is required”
  • distinguishing Drinkard, supra, and explaining that “where the crimes charged are based on more than one separate act or transaction, no merger is required”
  • “where the crimes charged are based on more than one separate act or transaction, no merger is required even for charges of] the same crime”
  • “where the crimes charged are based on more than one separate act or transaction, no merger is required even for charges of the same crime”
  • “where the crimes charged are based on more than one separate act or transaction, no merger is required even for charges of the same crime”
  • where victim was threatened with a gun, then struck with the gun and a separate object, then shot, all in an attempt by the defendant to rob the victim, the trial court “was authorized to conclude that the physical beating and either incident of gun use were separate completed crimes”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adams, Blackburn, Doyle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.