Yates v. Mississippi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[P]roviding a compensatory education should serve as a deterrent against states unnecessarily prolonging litigation in order to decrease their potential liability.”
• affirming two-year award because “[w]ithout it, the child’s right would depend upon his or her parent’s ability to fund the education during the years of administrative proceedings and federal court litigation.”
• “Compensatory education, like retroactive reimbursement, is necessary to preserve a handicapped [student’s] right to a free education.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).