Yates v. McDonald

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing dilution claim because plaintiff's trade dress was not famous beyond a niche sports market
• granting motion to transfer because key fact witnesses 16 were “outside of the geographic reach of this district’s subpoena power”
• “The Court cannot resolve questions of fact on a motion to dismiss.” (citations omitted)
• “The Court cannot resolve questions of fact on a motion to dismiss.” (citations omitted)
• dismissing trade dress dilution claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).