Yates v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding RCr 7.26(1) only requires production of statements; no requirement limits testimony to the four corners of a document

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Neal v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2003-01-23· cited 42×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brady v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
• Olmstead v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1928-06-04· cited 2,291×
• People v. Reagan
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1975-11-25· cited 100×
• Workman v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1979-01-16· cited 50×
• James v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1972-06-23· cited 44×
• Barnett v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1988-12-15· cited 33×
• Mounce v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1990-09-06· cited 14×
• Rolli v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1984-11-02· cited 10×