Yates v. Arkin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the withdrawal of an appellant’s pass privileges alone was insufficient to constitute arrest where an appellant remained on full-duty status and the barracks to which he was restrained 9 United States v. Schuber, No. 11-6002/AF included a variety of amenities
• plea of guilty not improvident, though sentence reversed, where maximum confinement 2 years rather than 6 years

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).