Skip to main content
· 5/4/1989

Yates Exploration, Inc. v. Valley Improvement Ass'n

Citations

  • 773 P.2d 350
  • 108 N.M. 405

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that where there is no right to relief under substantive law, impleader is improper
  • applying the principle that “[ujnsupported legal conclusions need not be accepted” in holding that a third-party complaint did not state an adequate basis for indemnity
  • “To come within the scope of Rule 1-014(A), the third-party’s potential liability must in some way be dependent upon the outcome of the main claim against the defendant [and traditionally, derivative or secondary liability to the defendant ... is considered to be essential.” (citations omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scarborough, Stowers, Baca

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.