Yasmin Reyazuddin v. Montgomery County, Maryland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that while most employees arrived at work around 9:00 a.m., there was no \explicit\ requirement to do so
• finding that the district court judge crediting one expert and discrediting another was not proper at summary judgment
• noting that “[t]he otherwise qualified element” of a discrimination claim “is the same as the third element of [a] failure- to-accommodate claim” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• finding that the county’s overall budget and the unit’s operating budget were relevant factors
• stating that employment discrimination claims under the Rehabilitation Act are evaluated using the same standards as the ADA and that the Rehabilitation Act adopts the ADA’s definition of disability
• determining that the ADA does not require that the “exact accommodation” requested be provided

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).