Yasmick Jeune v. U.S. Attorney General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the exhaustion requirement is jurisdictional and precludes review of a claim that was not presented to the BIA
• holding that a petitioner must make more than passing references to exhaust an issue
• explaining that a “reasoned-consideration examination does not look to whether the agency’s decision is supported by substantial evi- dence”
• stating that an applicant who has not suffered past persecution must show that internal relocation is not reasonable
• explaining that this Court generally lacks “jurisdiction to review a denial of withholding of removal for a criminal alien” except for claims of legal error
• explaining that an allega- tion that the Board applied an incorrect legal standard is a question of law sufficient to invoke our jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).