Yarmoski v. LLOYD

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that declaratory judgments “are not to be entered in anticipation of events that may never occur.”
• holding that declaratory judgments “are not to be entered in anticipation of events that may never occur.”
• holding that the alleged harm, the potential that the petitioner “may be sued . . . at some future point” if the preliminary injunction was denied, was speculative and could not be considered immediate and irreparable harm

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).