Yard & Blois's Syndic v. Srodes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that while only \minimal restriction\ on plaintiff's liberty is required, mere allegations that plaintiff was \deprived of liberty\ were insufficient to show Fourth Amendment seizure when plaintiff was released directly following arraignment
• noting that while only “minimal restriction” on plaintiff’s liberty is required, mere allegations 19 that plaintiff was “deprived of liberty” were insufficient to show Fourth Amendment seizure when plaintiff was released directly following arraignment
• dismissing a negligent supervision claim against the District because the complaint consisted of conclusory statements that the District failed to properly supervise and train its officers, but it did not reference \ any of the necessary legal elements\
• dismissing negligent supervision and training claims against the District where plaintiff failed to allege “‘actual or constructive knowledge’ of any problematic behavior on the part of the officers in question before the incident at issue.” (emphasis in original)
• “[F]ailures to supervise or train after the incident in question do not give rise to a reasonable inference that [the defendants] were on constructive notice of dangerous or incompetent behavior.”
• “What matters is that the notice ‘describe[ ] the injuring event with sufficient detail to reveal, in itself, a basis for the District’s potential liability.’” (emphasis omitted) (quoting Washington v. District of Columbia, 429 A.2d 1362, 1366 (D.C. 1981))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).