Yarbrough v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming summary judgment in favor of a defendant manufacturer in an AEMLD case because *Page 1058 the \there was no evidence to show that the utility of an alternative design outweighed the utility of the design actually used\
• affirming summary judgment on a warranty claim and holding that the issue of whether a product is unreasonably dangerous is not a question properly addressed in a claim alleging breach of warranty, but instead should be raised in a claim under the AEMLD
• “A negligent-failure-to-adequately- warn case cannot be submitted to a jury unless there is some evidence that the allegedly inadequate warning would have been read and heeded and would have kept the accident from occurring.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).