Yarbrough v. Collins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding property claimant’s action to quiet title brought seven years after title clearance action was barred by section 15-67-90 but implicitly recognizing that extrinsic fraud, if proven, could operate to preclude application of the three-year statute of limitations
• concluding property claimant’s action to quiet title brought seven years after title clearance action was barred by section 15-67-90 but implicitly recognizing that extrinsic fraud, if proven, could operate to preclude application of the three-year statute of limitations
• concluding property claimant’s action to quiet title brought seven years after title clearance action was barred by section 15-67-90 but implicitly recognizing that extrinsic fraud, if proven, could operate to preclude application of the three-year statute of limitations
• concluding property claimant’s action to quiet title brought seven years after title clearance action was barred by section 15-67-90 but implicitly recogniz ing that extrinsic fraud, if proven, could operate to preclude application of the three-year statute of limitations
• denying the setting aside of a judgment quieting title because section 15-67-90 imposes a three year statute of limitations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).