Yap v. Oceanside Union Free School District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that allegations of racist statements made by school staff to a student was insufficient to raise a substantive due process claim
• “Since, as discussed supra, the Court concludes that no reasonable trier of fact could conclude that constitutional deprivations occurred, the Court does not reach the qualified immunity analysis.”
• “Since, as discussed supra, the Court concludes that no reasonable trier of fact could conclude that constitutional deprivations occurred, the Court does not reach the qualified immunity analysis.”
• “Plaintiffs have proffered no case law wherein the alleged failure of a school to adequately discipline its students met [the] substantive due process threshold. The Court's independent research has similarly failed to reveal any such case law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).